Manchester United has faced serious backlash from aggrieved fans following a recent statement on Mason Greenwood.
The English maestro faced several counts of sexual assault charges after his girlfriend leaked his abusive intimate moment with her.
You may also like: I won’t play for Manchester United again – Mason Greenwood voices out amid his Rape allegation saga
He was suspended from all his football activities which left him with no club for almost a year tally following the view of his trials.
After what seemed to be an eternity of trial, Mason Greenwood’s charges were all dropped sparking a possible playing time for the English Gem.
The club’s statement currently causing a buzz online, has outlined that Mason Greenwood is still being investigated by Manchester United.
Manchester statement on Mason Greenwood:
“Following the dropping of all charges against Mason Greenwood in February 2023, Manchester United has conducted a thorough investigation into the allegations made against him.”
“This has drawn on extensive evidence and context not in the public domain, and we have heard from numerous people with direct involvement or knowledge of the case.”
“Throughout this process, the welfare and perspective of the alleged victim has been central to the club’s inquiries, and we respect her right to lifelong anonymity.”
“We also have responsibilities to Mason as an employee, as a young person who has been with the club since the age of seven, and as a new father with a partner.”
“The fact-finding phase of our investigation is now complete, and we are in the final stages of making a decision on Mason’s future.”
“Contrary to media speculation, that decision has not yet been made and is currently the subject of intensive internal deliberation. Responsibility ultimately rests with the Chief Executive Officer.”
“Once made, the decision will be communicated and explained to the club’s internal and external stakeholders.”
“This has been a difficult case for everyone associated with Manchester United, and we understand the strong opinions it has provoked based on the partial evidence in the public domain. We ask for patience as we work through the final stages of this carefully considered process”
